imux vs Windsurf
对比 imux 与 Windsurf：编辑器代理 vs 多代理 CLI、远程与浏览器证据。可并存。
Windsurf is an AI-first IDE (Cascade lineage) focused on editor-native agents and multi-file edits inside an IDE shell.
功能对比
| 功能 | imux | Windsurf |
|---|---|---|
| 多 agent 舰队（并行 CLI） | ✓ | 部分 |
| Linked Mode · Agent mesh | ✓ | ✗ |
| GPU 加速 | ✓ | ✗ |
| 为 macOS 而造 | ✓ | ✗ |
| 工作区与标签 | ✓ | 部分 |
| 分屏面板 | ✓ | ✓ |
| AI 原生设计 | ✓ | ✓ |
| 源码管理集成 | ✓ | ✓ |
| 远程文件资源管理器 | ✓ | 部分 |
| 浏览器自动化 | ✓ | 部分 |
| 监督器 · Mission Control | ✓ | ✗ |
| Socket 自动化 API | ✓ | ✗ |
| 活动通知 | ✓ | 部分 |
| 会话持久化 | ✓ | 部分 |
| 编辑器智能（LSP · 多文件编辑） | 部分 | ✓ |
| Inline Tab 补全 | ✗ | ✓ |
为什么选择 imux？
喜欢 Cascade 就保留 Windsurf；需要长任务 CLI、测试、远程与浏览器同屏时用 imux。
- Terminal-first multi-agent fleet for real CLI agents — not only IDE-bound agents
- Native macOS Ghostty-grade surfaces for long-running jobs
- Remote explorers, browser verification, and Git evidence in one operator window
- Socket/icc automation plane for hooks without fighting editor focus
- Honest coexistence: keep Windsurf for authoring when you want Cascade-style edits
如何切换
两者同装，同一仓库路径。实现与验证放 imux，Cascade 多文件编辑可留在 Windsurf。
- 1
Keep Windsurf for editor-native agents if you like Cascade
Do not force a full switch. Keep Windsurf for multi-file IDE edits when that loop is productive.
- 2
Install imux for execution and verification
Open the same repo in imux. Run long agent CLIs, tests, deploys, and log tails in native panes.
- 3
Close the loop with Git and browser
Use imux Git sidebar and browser surfaces for evidence before merge — independent of which editor wrote the patch.
常见问题
Is imux a Windsurf clone?▼
No. Windsurf optimizes IDE-native agents; imux optimizes multi-agent terminal operations and delivery evidence.
Can both stay installed?▼
Yes. That is the recommended default for teams that still want editor Cascade flows.